markup sample, minor book index fix

2 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/data/doc/sisu/v1/markup-samples/samples/free_as_in_freedom.richard_stallman_crusade_for_free_software.sam_williams.sst b/data/doc/sisu/v1/markup-samples/samples/free_as_in_freedom.richard_stallman_crusade_for_free_software.sam_williams.sst
index bfcd69e0..cedea281 100644
--- a/data/doc/sisu/v1/markup-samples/samples/free_as_in_freedom.richard_stallman_crusade_for_free_software.sam_williams.sst
+++ b/data/doc/sisu/v1/markup-samples/samples/free_as_in_freedom.richard_stallman_crusade_for_free_software.sam_williams.sst
@@ -2024,7 +2024,7 @@ Although not the first person to view software as public property, Stallman is g
 Predicting the future is risky sport, but most people, when presented with the question, seemed eager to bite. "One hundred years from now, Richard and a couple of other people are going to deserve more than a footnote," says Moglen. "They're going to be viewed as the main line of the story."
 
 The "couple other people" Moglen nominates for future textbook chapters include John Gilmore, Stallman's GPL advisor and future founder of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, and Theodor Holm Nelson, a.k.a. Ted Nelson, author of the 1982 book, Literary Machines. Moglen says Stallman, Nelson, and Gilmore each stand out in historically significant, nonoverlapping ways. He credits Nelson, commonly considered to have coined the term "hypertext," for identifying the predicament of information ownership in the digital age. Gilmore and Stallman, meanwhile, earn notable credit for identifying the negative political effects of information control and building organizations-the Electronic Frontier Foundation in the case of Gilmore and the Free Software Foundation in the case of Stallman-to counteract those effects. Of the two, however, Moglen sees Stallman's activities as more personal and less political in nature.
-={Electronic Frontier Foundation;Gilmore, John;Nelson, Theodor Holm+2;Nelson Ted+2}
+={Electronic Frontier Foundation;Gilmore, John;Nelson, Theodor Holm+2;Nelson, Ted+2}
 
 "Richard was unique in that the ethical implications of unfree software were particularly clear to him at an early moment," says Moglen. "This has a lot to do with Richard's personality, which lots of people will, when writing about him, try to depict as epiphenomenal or even a drawback in Richard Stallman's own life work."
 
diff --git a/data/doc/sisu/v2/markup-samples/samples/free_as_in_freedom.richard_stallman_crusade_for_free_software.sam_williams.sst b/data/doc/sisu/v2/markup-samples/samples/free_as_in_freedom.richard_stallman_crusade_for_free_software.sam_williams.sst
index a56f0ae4..151eb6c3 100644
--- a/data/doc/sisu/v2/markup-samples/samples/free_as_in_freedom.richard_stallman_crusade_for_free_software.sam_williams.sst
+++ b/data/doc/sisu/v2/markup-samples/samples/free_as_in_freedom.richard_stallman_crusade_for_free_software.sam_williams.sst
@@ -2024,7 +2024,7 @@ Although not the first person to view software as public property, Stallman is g
 Predicting the future is risky sport, but most people, when presented with the question, seemed eager to bite. "One hundred years from now, Richard and a couple of other people are going to deserve more than a footnote," says Moglen. "They're going to be viewed as the main line of the story."
 
 The "couple other people" Moglen nominates for future textbook chapters include John Gilmore, Stallman's GPL advisor and future founder of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, and Theodor Holm Nelson, a.k.a. Ted Nelson, author of the 1982 book, Literary Machines. Moglen says Stallman, Nelson, and Gilmore each stand out in historically significant, nonoverlapping ways. He credits Nelson, commonly considered to have coined the term "hypertext," for identifying the predicament of information ownership in the digital age. Gilmore and Stallman, meanwhile, earn notable credit for identifying the negative political effects of information control and building organizations-the Electronic Frontier Foundation in the case of Gilmore and the Free Software Foundation in the case of Stallman-to counteract those effects. Of the two, however, Moglen sees Stallman's activities as more personal and less political in nature.
-={Electronic Frontier Foundation;Gilmore, John;Nelson, Theodor Holm+2;Nelson Ted+2}
+={Electronic Frontier Foundation;Gilmore, John;Nelson, Theodor Holm+2;Nelson, Ted+2}
 
 "Richard was unique in that the ethical implications of unfree software were particularly clear to him at an early moment," says Moglen. "This has a lot to do with Richard's personality, which lots of people will, when writing about him, try to depict as epiphenomenal or even a drawback in Richard Stallman's own life work."